Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Key factors identified in a report on the Sofa Super Store fire

Thursday, May 15, 2008


Tyrone Walker
The Post and Courier/File

Building and Property

The Sofa Super Store was a high risk occupancy that presented several specific risks to the health and safety of firefighters. The fire risk factors that were found in this occupancy also presented risks to the employees, customers, neighbors, and the surrounding community. The level of fire risk exceeded the limits prescribed by established regulations and would have —or should have — been mitigated if the applicable codes and standards had been followed, applied, and enforced.

The fire could have been prevented. If the property had been constructed and maintained in accordance with state and local codes the fire would have been quickly controlled: no lives would have been lost and the fire would have been of little consequence.

Fire Department Operations

The fire suppression operations that were conducted by the Charleston Fire Department at the Sofa Super Store did not comply with federal occupational health and safety regulations, with NFPA consensus standards, or with modern fire service expectations. These deviations from standard operational and safety practices exposed firefighters to excessive risks and failed to remove the nine deceased firefighters from a critically dangerous situation.

The predominant factor identified in the analysis of Fire Department operations is the failure to manage the incident according to accepted practices. There was no structured incident command system in place and the essential duties of an Incident Commander were not performed. The operation was conducted in an unstructured and uncoordinated manner, without overall direction and with inadequate supervision.

The Charleston Fire Department was inadequately staffed, inadequately trained, insufficiently equipped, and organizationally unprepared to conduct an operation of this complexity in a large commercial occupancy. The Department attempted to compensate for the limited resources and organizational inadequacies by engaging in dangerously aggressive and uncoordinated fire fighting operations.




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  4 comment(s)

Posted by bravecharleston9myspace on May 15, 2008 at 1:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

WE WANT THE FULL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS!!

sigh....
what a long day this is going to be....



Posted by gococks1985 on May 15, 2008 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Now that we know the City was partly to blame for the tragic deaths of these 9 men, I wonder if they will be included in the 7 lawsuits already in process by the family of the dearly departed. I doubt it, but if they are going to sue everyone that is to blame for this, then it should be all or nothing.



Posted by bravecharleston9myspace on May 15, 2008 at 4:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

WHAT EVER THEY DO....THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO REMEMBER THE TRUTH AND SUPPORT THEM.....AND NOT CALL THEM GREEDY.

THIS IS ABOUT JUSTICE FOR OUR FALLEN 9 BROTHERS!

THE REPORTS CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE TO DIE...NINE GREAT FIREFIGTHERS, DADS, HUSBANDS COULD STILL BE WITH US!

never forgetting together,
missy



Posted by luvmydogs59 on May 15, 2008 at 6:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I posted this in the other thread regarding the violations and it bears repeating here:

Posted by luvmydogs59 on May 15, 2008 at 6:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe now the folks who were complaining in yesterday's posts about the firefighter's families being greedy for suing SSS, will realize now that these lawsuits are justified! How much clearer can these many violations be?

Also, as quoted from the above article:
"--The code violations would have been discovered if the City of Charleston had conducted regular fire inspections and if firefighters had been trained to identify code violations during pre-fire planning visits and report them to the Inspections Department."

The city is as much as fault as SSS. I don't care how much money was raised for the families, not only do they deserve it, but I hope they get what they deserve from these lawsuits. The tragic deaths of those 9 heroes could have been easily prevented!!




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)