Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Blowin’ in the wind

Coal dust fuels controversy over bid to expand shipping terminal

The Post and Courier
Monday, June 30, 2008


Even in the parching heat of South Carolina's summer sun, the ground at one local industrial site stays saturated.

Ankle-deep puddles and muddy gullies dot the landscape at Kinder Morgan Energy Partners' terminal on the Cooper River in Charleston. Workers and computerized spraying systems constantly are wetting the ground, trying to keep particles of coal from escaping into the wind and dusting the surrounding area.

The Texas-based company recently spent $1.5 million to install and upgrade equipment that's designed to help water the site. Still, tiny pieces of coal and cement have managed to drift over to the Cooper River Marina and onto Paul Hensarling's 30-foot sailboat.

"The water you wash off the docks literally runs black," he said.

For more than a year, marina tenants and nearby residents have been reacting to the company's request to expand, at times speaking out against the proposal and other times listening to Kinder Morgan officials explain their operation at monthly meetings, as part of a newly created advisory panel. Environmental regulators still are drafting a permit for the expansion, which likely will be issued later this summer.

Advisory panel members have learned that the dust around the facility doesn't exceed federal standards for particles in the air. And the forum has made some progress: What was once sheer anger on the part of nearby residents has mellowed into a placated politeness.

But despite the corporate openness, some boaters and residents are still skeptical. And some remain nervous about supporting the Kinder Morgan expansion, which would more than double the amount of coal allowed to pass through the terminal en route to power plants throughout the Southeast.

Gayle Frampton, a soft-spoken but feisty Park Circle resident who has attended the meetings, said the company has come a long way. She noted that she has watched loaded coal cars leave the facility without generating dust clouds. But she still isn't convinced Kinder Morgan should be allowed to expand.

"The jury's still out on that," she said. "I think that it is very good what they have done, but I would hate to see them get too big that it creates more of a problem."

Long process

Three years ago, Kinder Morgan announced plans to expand its Charleston operations by adding an extra docking terminal and a second coal pile that would span about 5 acres. The additional capacity would create about 45 jobs.

The expansion would enable the company to play a bigger role in the energy industry, as power utilities across the Southeast are importing increasing amounts of coal from South America to keep up with growing electricity demand.

The company applied for permits through the state Department of Health and Environmental Control's Bureau of Air Quality. During the public comment period for the application, residents and boaters said they feared if dust and train traffic were problems at current levels of operation, an expansion would worsen the situation.

Kinder Morgan responded by making improvements: it installed a mist machine that suppresses puffs of coal dust that occur when the raw, black chunks are dumped onto the conveyer belt. And they set up a computerized system that turns on water sprayers around the coal pile when the wind picks up.

Workers also began spraying the coal after it's loaded onto rail cars, forming a crust that could prevent dust from shaking off into the neighborhoods as the trains pass through. The rail cars also are loaded on a recently extended track that has cut what was a 25-minute train crossing time down to less than 10 minutes, said Arthur Rudolph, the company's regional general manager.

"We're spending quite a bit of money here to improve our terminal," he said.

Those improvements weren't required by state regulators, but were undertaken as a way of earning community support, which could help smooth the permitting process.

Still, boaters at the marina say the coal dust often settles on their property as ships are unloaded, a process that usually takes less than four days. Dustings are more frequent when the wind blows upstream, as it usually does during the summer.

YouTube factor

Skepticism runs deep among boaters who rent slips at the county-run marina. Over the years, the facility has lost a handful of customers who got tired of washing the film off their boats. The frustration was fueled in part by a video that one boater took, and later posted on YouTube.com, of the crane bucket scooping up river water and dumping it on a ship to rinse it off.

Rudolph publicly apologized for the incident, promising it wouldn't happen again. And he said he's confident that the improvements are working to cut down on coal dust.

"It depends who you talk to," he said. "We have heard that the improvements are working. We are confident that the improvements ... have been effective."

The company's openness also has helped residents understand how Kinder Morgan operates, he added. Company executives have been meeting monthly with a panel of residents and community activists, giving them a chance to explore topics such as emergency planning and air-quality regulations.

While panel members say they're grateful for the information, the process has frustrated some, who have realized the limited control Kinder Morgan has over the site. For example, the company can't cover the rail cars because it does not own them. It also does not own the ships that dock at its terminals, meaning it cannot require that idling vessels reduce their air emissions by switching to cleaner-burning diesel fuel.

Kinder Morgan doesn't even own the coal it handles, making workers cautious about overwatering or damaging its customers' shipments.

"The meetings have been informative, but they aren't going to reach any conclusion that people are going to be happy with because you can't address the entire problem," said advisory board member and West Ashley resident Bob O'Brien. "DHEC doesn't have the money or the facilities to address the entire problem."

DHEC officials have conducted tests to see if the air at the marina is safe to breathe. The testing showed that the dust level doesn't violate federal health standards, but other tests did confirm that the biggest component of the dust at the marina is coal.

State officials still are making changes to the facility's proposed permit, tacking on extra conditions meant to help control emissions. They likely will give final approval to the expansion in late summer.

Susan Yates, a DHEC air quality manager who is working on the permit, said the air permits sought by big companies such as Kinder Morgan are permits that allow them to pollute. The state's job is to determine how much is allowable, she explained.

"Most businesses that have air emissions, they can't operate with out emitting something," she said.

Reach Katy Stech at 937-5549 or kstech@postandcourier.com.




Article tools





Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by GoBoilers on June 30, 2008 at 6:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The allure of clean domestically produced energy warms the hearts of environmentalists, but it seems unlikely to pragmatists that a few windmills and solar panels can displace carbon based fuels.

We need more domestically produced energy.

http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/06/a...



Posted by zoomru on July 1, 2008 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

GoBoilers.. hear, hear BUT!

We need to tap ALL forms..ALL. When we have people miss-inform the public and say that South Carolina has NO wind? What a LIE!! We ought to be leading the nation. When teamwork between city, county, state, business, Developers, and homeowners is not even DISCUSSED or given priority in news or PRINT....what a shame. We reap what we SOW. We have SMART engineers and technicians who know how to solve these issues; but when no emphasis or leadership is displayed to say this is the way. Talk about ...BLIND. These COOP officials know what we have and what is possible but they want to protect a "BUSINESS MODEL"; well ALL bases should be covered. These COOPS should be leading the charge and publicizing; not only GOOD WILL, but a VISION of what is COMING...next year, or five years. If their own labor base was AWAKE to the possibilities; talk about a MUTINY? With 3.5 million tons of trash and the coastal wind ALONE would result in how many MEGAWATTS. Combine that with 34 tons of Nuclear and YES.....new CLEAN COAL technolgy and our state would transform and actually LEAPFROG the rest of the country in new business GROWTH. These fine officials just don't get it....Its the Energy ...Stupid!
www.startech.net + www.superturbine.net + unimodal.com are three steps in the general direction. Are they the RIGHT answers...pretty DARN CLOSE !!




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)